"The Social Question Has Been Neglected"
Interview with Nassar Ibrahim, chief editor of ’Al Hadaf’, the
newspaper of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
(PFLP).
Question : Your organization played a major role in the Palestinian
resistance movement in the 1970s and 80s. Why do we hear so little
about the PFLP these days ?
Nassar Ibrahim : The Palestinian left is in a very difficult
situation right now. On the one hand, we were strongly affected by
the global crisis on the left after 1989. The collapse of the
Soviet Union had a very negative effect on us, because for a long
time we wrongly depended on a foreign model of revolution which
was not right for the Palestinian situation. Now we are paying the
price for that uncritical approach. But there are also domestic
political reasons for our crisis. The central focus of our
politics was always the struggle of the Palestinian people for
national liberation and against the occupation policies of Israel.
We treated the Palestinian people as a unit, thereby failing to
pay attention to the contradictions which exist within Palestinian
society. The social question hardly played a role in our thinking.
For the past few years, however, we have been trying to correct
such mistakes and mark out our own revolutionary path. We are also
in a dialogue with the Democratic Front for the Liberation of
Palestine (DFLP), who are also affected by the crisis, with the
aim of creating a long-term unity in order to strengthen the
weight of the Palestinian left.
Haven’t the Oslo Agreement and the creation of the Palestinian
Authority by Arafat caught your organization by surprise and made
the crisis even more deep ?
I think the Oslo Agreement is only very little to blame for
the crisis on the left. Of course we have to orient ourselves to
this new situation. The crisis is more affected by our
relationship to the new Palestinian autonomy officials. There are
two tendencies within the Palestinian left concerning this issue.
One faction is for taking part in the Palestinian Authority, with
the aim of changing it from the inside. That is the position of
the Communist Party of Palestine, which was present with delegates
during the peace negotiations. The other faction strictly rejects
participation in the Palestinian Authority. The PFLP and the DFLP
are part of this tendency. We rejected participation in the peace
process from the beginning, because to us it was clear that the
global balance of power was not in our favor. Peace talks at this
time can only have negative results for us.
Is your organization really united behind such a position ?
Of course we have a variety of opinions within the PFLP. But
we think that’s positive. Parties which refuse to allow differing
opinions become stagnant. The important thing is to stay unified,
despite having different opinions. We have adopted a new approach
to democratic centralism. We have struck a balance so that the
democracy does not end in chaos and the centralism does not become
authoritarian.
How does this balance look with respect to the question of the
autonomy authorities ? There are PFLP members who work with the
Palestinian Authority.
Members of our organization are not banned from working with
this authority. PFLP members work in civil, health, and cultural
associations. We were active in those areas even before the Oslo
Agreement was signed. These associations only became part of the
Palestinian Authority afterwards. Our members will stay active
within them. But PFLP members are prohibited from taking part in
the political offices, forces of repression, or negotiating
committees of the Palestinian Authority.
In the past few months, Arafat has been waving the issue of a
national dialogue with all Palestinian groups like a fist in the
face of the Israeli government. Is the PFLP being pressured to
take part in such a process ?
We have always stated that we support a dialogue between
different Palestinian forces. But we don’t want a dialogue just
for the sake of talking, nor do we want to take part in a process
which is just a front for the Palestinian Authority’s policies.
There have been pseudo-conferences under the motto of "National
Dialogue" before, but the Palestinian Authority has never been
willing to change its course. Because the differences among
Palestinian groups with respect to the Oslo Agreement are so vast,
there is no basis right now for a dialogue.
Do you have any dialogue with the Israeli left ?
The Israeli left is very weak. With the few forces that are
willing, we do have contacts at all levels and we organize joint
protests and informational meetings. We hope that the leftist
forces in Israel will gain in importance. The PFLP has no problems
with the citizens of Israel. We want to live together with them in
equality.
Do leftist organizations like the PFLP see any danger in the rise
of Islamic groups like Hamas ?
In many parts of the world, religious forces have gained in
strength since the decline of the left. In Palestine, the
Islamists have decades of tradition and they can’t be compared to
Islamic groups in Iran or Algeria. At the moment, the Palestinian
people are in a phase of national liberation, and for us as
leftists, the main issue is the Israeli occupation. On this issue,
we are united with the Islamic groups, in so far as they are also
fighting against the occupation. But in almost all other areas, we
have large differences with the Islamists, especially in social
questions, the status of women in the society, and so on.
You have stated that one mistake of the Palestinian left in the
past was to focus the struggle on the Israeli occupation while
forgetting the social question, but your organization still
considers the Israeli occupation to be its most important issue.
How have your politics in fact changed ?
The main contradiction in the society, the Israeli
occupation, became clearer during the Intifada and continues to
this day. The Oslo Agreement did not change this. On the contrary :
the situation of the Palestinian people has become worse. So for
us, the struggle against Israeli occupation has taken on an even
greater significance. But we are just as determined to struggle
within Palestinian society itself. We work against the policies
of the bourgeoisie, assembled in the Palestinian Authority.
We are seeking to activate the social work of women, children,
youths, and neighborhood committees. Another important issue is
freedom for the ca. 3,500 Palestinian prisoners still being held
by Israel, and the return of Palestinian refugees in exile.
Has the human rights situation changed at all since the signing of
the Oslo Agreement and Arafat coming to power ?
Unfortunately, not much has changed. Despite the Oslo
Agreement, the occupation continues. The land and the people,
except for a few cities, are still controlled by Israel, and they
continue to suffer. So human rights violations continue. Some
examples : the comprehensive blockades by Israel, which prevent
Palestinians from going to work. That results in great financial
and psychological strain for people. Then there are the arbitrary
arrests at Israeli checkpoints in Palestinian areas, usually
without reason. Houses belonging to Palestinian families are
destroyed because they supposedly had no building permits. But at
the same time, Israel continues to build settlements on
Palestinian land. And the torture of Palestinian prisoners is
still allowed under Israeli law.
What is the situation of political prisoners in Palestine ?
The number of Palestinian and Arab political prisoners in
Israel is about 3,500. People can be held without charge for 6
months. This time period can be extended, so it’s possible for
people to be held for more than 6 years without being convicted of
anything. 150 political prisoners are under the age of 18. The
prisoners are dispersed between 12 different prisons, some of
which are just tent camps in the desert. The conditions for
prisoners are very hard, especially as far as their health is
concerned, which is why 500 or so are very ill. Visits are only
occasionally allowed. At the present time, we have launched a
campaign for Mohammad Raja Nerat, alias Abou Rafaa. He was born in
1929 and has been in prison for more than 25 years. Although he is
very ill, he has no chance for release, because he is serving a
life sentence, which for Palestinians means they will die in
prison. Recently he sent a very personal letter to Palestinian and
international organizations. He knows that he doesn’t have long to
live, but in his letter, he asks people not to forget him. We feel
his case is exemplary of the situation of political prisoners in
Palestine.
(Interview by Peter Nowak ; Translated by Arm The Spirit from
’Sozialistische Zeitung’ #1/1998
)